"Strict or Loose Constructionist?"
I would consider myself a strict constructionist not a loose one. The reason being is I think that the states should have power over there region because all regions are different from each other. For example, California is the total opposite of North Dakota, so why should they have the same social laws since they have different problems. This relates to "implied powers" because the central government is taking too much of what could be the states power away. The preamble limits what the government could be involved in but when it is interpreted broadly, it starts to take away from the individual and the state.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
The states should have their own power over that state because each state has different problems and issues that not all the other states may have. If each state was controlled they could deal with their own situation and focus on how to improve it.
ReplyDelete